[grip_daddy]

ATLian,

You have rephrased my posts to sound that I said, "since science said that God doesn't exist, so science doesn't exist".

No, it should sound, "since science cannot prove dark energy, which might as well be a property of a Being, they should not exclude the possibility of that Being existing."

Science should not demand empirical evidence to prove existence of God, and also stop claiming that lack of empirical evidence means no God. Their approach to investigation cannot investigate God, so it is stupid to conclude that God doesn't exist.

Just imagine a scientist who wants to prove existence of yeast in bread, but goes to set an experiment in space to measure the redshift of light from supernova. Then he concludes, yeast and bread dont exist; Yeah, it is the same as trying to measure God in material reality.