sajtas,
>>trying to score brownie points? I have bad news for you,
>what
>>he stated is fully correct, both in macro and micro, if you
>>don't accept it please provide a reliable scientific source
>>that proves otherwise.
>
>Coach, always spoiling for a fight eh? who said i didn't agree
>with him? You always like some confrontation don't ya?
Well, when you said "hey this guy doesn't know his micro from his macro" I didn't realise you were speaking of yourself.
>No I do not.....I think like a common person with some common
>sense.....one does not need religion to practice common sense
>or respect or fairness or rationale.
Common sense isn't so common mate, so take that as a complement! Religion gives you guidance and just because you believe in a certain religion (as you correctly stated) doesn't guarantee that you will use your intellect in the correct manner.
>> because the believer believes and anything that
>>adds to his/her belief is just a move towards the positive.
>
>One either has faith or one doesn't, one either believes or
>one doesn't......there is no grey area in between, there is no
>sitting on the fence. One cannot believe in God and then
>observe a 'miracle' and then believe even more........that is
>an obvious sign of a lingering doubt somewhere.
Belief is like love, there are different levels. Belief, just like love, can can grow and be stronger.
>>Most
>>scientists are divided on issue of creation, most are
>atheists
>>because God's existence can not be proved. But good sajtas
>>here is going BEYOND that and is going to prove to us (not
>>only God's existence) but HIS COMPOSITION! I can't wait!
>
>Oh yes, that I will......but i will also tackle it slowly so
>that you can get time to reflect on it and absorb it. Now be a
>good eager puppy but wait!
I will contact the Nobel Committee in Stockholm when you can show without any doubt what the composition of God is. That should also dispell the claims of those who don't believe in God. ATLian are you hearing this?
>>PS: You don't impress me with your proton, neutron, electron
>>talk and you better have good explanation. I work with
>>positrons and electrons in my day to day work and I'm also
>>familiar with particles all the way to qaurks and "strings".
>
>You know what Coach, unlike your extreme humility where you
>don't tell us about your vast depth of knowledge.......(oh by
>the way i have no clue what "qaurk" is but certainly know what
>a quark is!!!!!),I keep it simple. But in your infinite
>wisdom, could you please tell us exactly what an electron
>is???? Please, i'm not kidding here.....how do you describe an
>electron? If an atom was the size of the room you are in, how
>big in comparison would the nucleus be???
My wisdom is very limited, that is why you won't see me claiming I know what God is made of. You want to know what an electron is? Google it and you'll find millions of hits. I wasn't acting all mighty, just reminding you that using words like electron and proton wouldn't make your task easier.
>I will not be discouraged.....and you my friend ( am I your
>friend??) should be brave enough to have patience with what I
>say, you never know who you are talking to, this could be
>Allah you are talking to.
I don't know whether I can call you a friend; I don't know your first name and have never seen you, but we can not use the same criteria on the internet as we do in real life can we?
>hey let's talk about the christian fellow in Afghanistan
>(Abdul Rahman?) who's probably going to be put to death unless
>ofcourse he reverts to Islam, what's your take on this, as
>tolerant as you are brother Coach???
You seem to have a very short memory, we've discussed this and this was your response to my contribution "yawn!no seriously yawn!!!" No wonder you ask me the same things over and over again. See for yourself...
http://www.mashada.com/forums/index....=&topic_page=2
RE: A prayer for tm -
03-22-2006, 08:44 PM
Linear Mode
