RE: She is unable to keep up -
09-06-2005, 03:45 PM
Imagine a marriage where condoms,pills,injections and hormonal imbalances, risk of cancer,mood swings, possible bleeding,blood clots,once a week patches etc are all removed.All gone. You wanna make love or have sex (whatever you call it) with your wife and nooo stress. I think thats great!! Why would anybody wanna exhaust all else? What for when this option makes all that above go away with the SAME results if not better. I'm pro birth control. I just wish it was safer coz i fear most of it (save for condoms) is not.
On a diff note, one time i was watching this science documentary that was basically talking/teaching about the scientific side of 'love' and procreation. Basically one of the tests they did involved our sense of smell. Basically couple of men all showered with the same scentless ish wore similar t-shirts hanged out and at the end of the day, various females were asked to smell each man's smelly t-shirt. The women hadn't met the guys. Anywho, eventually all the chicks would pick which shirt smelled from ok,to bad to worse etc. Anyway in one test all the women found that the dudes who had a skin disorder (acne) t-shirts smelled the worst (they'd been deliberately included with healthy clear skinned men) indicating that basically,under controlled conditions,they could smell out a sick man and thus not 'hook up' be attracted and eventually not breed with him. In the second test, diff variety of men ,same ol same ol test
but this time, the shirts that smelled the worst to each women (some gagged) turned out to be shirts that were worn by their male BLOOD relatives i.e natures way of ensuring that blood does not mix with blood while the ok ones where non blood relatives.
Point? hehe i'm gettting to that LOL K, anyway as this scientist is rambling on and on, he happens to mention in passing that women who are on Birth control like the pill, jection, patch have it affect their hormones and so their natural sense of smell ie scientific love that is supposed to help ensure that they mate with the right male in order to produce the most suitable offspring is thrown off balance. So get this...every chick they used for the experiments had to be pill/patch/jection free. Now thats a better arguement than the religious one eh? At least for hormonal pills. Anyway i still say the church is out to get us thru 'guilt' and no substance. Three cheers to the condom!!
Anywho, look at China and India. I don't remember which female PM it was (India) who ended up screwing her people over some decades back by tricking them into getting sterilised coz of the population problem. Off course this was wrong. In our case too it is not important right now because of HIV but if this was not the case,and we were planning to move forward economically, honestly we would have to deal with a growing population whose resourses cannot sustain. You have to remember that in the past people dies in wars, famine, didn't live that long,disease etc. Now we would have to feed all these people, house them provide health all the while folks are having more and more children that they cannot afford to bring up. Every single department would be straining. More food means more and more people and these people should be able to understand that they cannot just zaa and the system will take care of everything else. Look at polygamy. As much as it was common, in many places it has decreased some. Why? Not becasue men have stopped desiring to have more wives. They just cannot afford them and are forced to see the light and get with the program. Plus i don't think many men understand how good it is for a woman to be able to control how many kids she has. Its a big deal. We love kids but we are also the ones who carry them and its not easy i imagine for someone to give birth to 7-12 kids. Not easy man.
Damn this was a long post....
|
Linear Mode
