Presidency -
04-09-2008, 04:05 AM
You have explained it as it is. The crux of the matter lies in what you have alluded to. We have technocrats, we have very educated civil service and private sector. Better than some of the developed countries ( I stand to be corrected- there are very few Countries with so many professors, Doctors, Masters holders as members of parliament or as permanent secretaries).
Our problem has been in standing firm on serious home grown solutions. When somebody in Harvard/MIT/Chicago or whatever comes with an experimental Blue Print, our technocrats accept it. Even when those bringing the ideas are of inferior qualification than us. Then before you know it, the Ministry of Planning jump into " joint project" with a twinkle of an eye,documents are signed in the glare of TV and the money is released to implement new but otherwise flawed ideas.
When the World Bank Introduced cost sharing and encouraged scrapping of extension service, the European Union was busy increasing farm subsidies and education bursaries. In UK they were introducing boom for 17 year olds to encourage them go on studying instead of dropping out to do drugs and sex as most of them do ( yes, they get 50 pounds a week if they go on studying, if they don't want, they are free to claim unemployed credit upto 70 pound a week). While they told us to scrap boom, UK graduates get loans which they can only pay back if they earn more than 15,000 pounds a year. They pay 3,000 pounds a year as fees, International students pay 10-13,000 pounds a year on average.
As for farmers if their crops fail, they get paid, if the international market is bad they get paid. If their cows are killed because of an epidemic, they get official compensation. Teenagers getting pregnant are free to apply for Free housing and child support and they do get. The list is long.
My argument is that we have had people in Government who implement anything given by the west. We dont look at our circumstances, and initiate our own solutions.
Do you think if we had a good president, a president who can sit for 3 hours arguing with a minister as to why we are doing this and not that, things will change???????????????
I am a member of idhaa Community Forum
|