[reggie_woic]

Homos choose and I bet God has nothing to do with their choice-making.

kemi,

see right there...your ignorance is based on ignorance, and your bible thumping isn't helping matters
we as christians need to evolve and embrace science facts because they are facts
kemi it seems as if your growth ended once The Book was finished. we need to relate our
beliefs to contemporary findings.

there's a reason we still don't stone adulterers despite what The Book says...

[Wamax74.]

Originally Posted by reggie_woic

kemi,

see right there...your ignorance is based on ignorance, and your bible thumping isn't helping matters
we as christians need to evolve and embrace science facts because they are facts
kemi it seems as if your growth ended once The Book was finished. we need to relate our
beliefs to contemporary findings.

there's a reason we still don't stone adulterers despite what The Book says...
[/color]

God did not create any homo. If he did, it would be in the bible or any of the holy books. Even nature would have evidence, such as a d.ick that is able to sieve s.hit as you f.uck some faggot in the ass.

Right now if i wanted to have some ass action, I just go to the gay bars and buy me some. That doesnt mean am homo. It means i made a concious decision to do it. It has nothing to do with God. Its all about choice.

Phew. I hate homos!

[crazy boo]

Originally Posted by Wamax74.

God did not create any homo. If he did, it would be in the bible or any of the holy books. Even nature would have evidence, such as a d.ick that is able to sieve s.hit as you f.uck some faggot in the ass.Right now if i wanted to have some ass action, I just go to the gay bars and buy me some. That doesnt mean am homo. It means i made a concious decision to do it. It has nothing to do with God. Its all about choice.

Phew. I hate homos!

Oh lawd...

I've had serious talks with gay people female and male. If u were abused, chances are you can either be straight or gay. Ask Elianto. So if u are male and are gay you were either fuc.k.ked in the ass when young, or you've made a conscious decision to be fu.k.ked in the ass.

For women, they tend to want "less hurt" or "more affection" by getting another woman.Otherwise why is it that many women with kids prior to their gay relationships were with men? Or why do those gay couples crave kids using other peoples sperms or wombs. God aside, If creation considered procreation and continous productivity or say growth of the animal kingdom, why is it that homosexuals have to depend on others to give birth? Nature dictates any relationship should be "self sustaining". So faggots and lesbians if u depend on others to give birth then you are not in the circles of nature.

D.kk and pu.s.sy is like a lock and key mechanism. I know some roll their eyes etc but if being smart is determined by how well I comprehend and accept faggots, let me be silly for life. Afterall being smart is recognizing simple facts. Simple- lock and key,lock and key, not lock and lock,key and key-even a pre unit kid understands this. Fkk!


Homosexuality is a choice.

[al-zalzalah]

Originally Posted by crazy boo

D.kk and pu.s.sy is like a lock and key mechanism. I know some roll their eyes etc but if being smart is determined by how well I comprehend and accept faggots, let me be silly for life. Afterall being smart is recognizing simple facts. Simple- lock and key,lock and key, not lock and lock,key and key-even a pre unit kid understands this. Fkk!
Homosexuality is a choice.

let's draw a line between being attracted to somebody of the same sex and having intercourse with somebody of the same sex. a person can make the choice to have sex with somebody of the same sex, but that person does not choose to be attracted, the attraction comes on its own, apende asipende.

if homosexuality is a choice, then it follows that heterosexuality is also a choice. how many of us heterosexuals remember deciding at some point in our lives that we were going to be attracted to somebody of the opposite sex. can you engineer who you are going to be attracted to? course not. physical attraction or chemistry is decided at the most basic of chemical and hormonal levels. so how can we take credit and feel selfrighteous in being heterosexual when it was not us who decided to be heterosexual, but rather, God or nature who decided to make us heterosexual?

a person can be gay and still be celibate. in fact some gay people choose to remain celibate because they are firmly religious and can not reconcile their sexuality with the teachings of their religion. so for those who are horrified by the idea of anal sex or of sexual intimacy between same sex partners, do you also judge gay people who choose to remain celibate?

[al-zalzalah]

Originally Posted by Wamax74.

God did not create any homo. If he did, it would be in the bible or any of the holy books.

so who made them? another god?
interesting way to make an argument. let me try something similar.
God did not create any duckbilled platypus/ virus. If he did it would be in the bible or any of the holy books.

[al-zalzalah]

Originally Posted by reggie_woic

there's a reason we still don't stone adulterers despite what The Book says...[/color]

reggie, i got a question for ya. please angalia inbox.

[Type R]

Much as one has no choice over one's sexual orientation, people also do not have a choice over how they react to the sexual orientation/activities of others.

Therefore homophobics also have the same right to feelings of revulsion and hatred, and no one can say "shame on Mashadites."

[ndigila]

Originally Posted by al-zalzalah

a person can be gay and still be celibate. in fact some gay people choose to remain celibate because they are firmly religious and can not reconcile their sexuality with the teachings of their religion. so for those who are horrified by the idea of anal sex or of sexual intimacy between same sex partners, do you also judge gay people who choose to remain celibate?

In religions, homosexuality is viewed as an act, while in today's society it is viewed as a state of existence (a sexuality). So I think from a religious perspective, homosexual attractions are temptations to sin, while homosexual sex is the sin itself.

[Type R]

Originally Posted by ndigila

In religions, homosexuality is viewed as an act, while in today's society it is viewed as a state of existence (a sexuality). So I think from a religious perspective, homosexual attractions are temptations to sin, while homosexual sex is the sin itself.

"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, etc..."

The desire per se is sin under that commandment.

[ATLian]

Originally Posted by Nerimae

ATLian, are you gay? Or just very open minded?

No, I'm as straight as you can be. I'm just open minded and not bigoted.

BTW it's interesting that if I was defending children, nobody would ask me if I was a child. If I was defending women, nobody would ask me if I'm a woman. But when I defend gays, everyone wonders if I'm gay.

Originally Posted by Nerimae

Only reason i'm against gay people is I dont want my kids to one day think its ok to be gay, honestly i'd rather have straight kids.

I also would not want my kids to be gay. Like Lesbiana alluded to when she talked about gayness not being a choice, who would want that stigma and the issues that come around with it to follow ones kids around forever?