
04-17-2008, 02:08 AM
Is it idiocy or what? Mo-uk's question was very objective and those with some rationality gave logical answers (read Jaykam and YB) but few refuse to reason objectively.
Why discuss Karl? He can also choose to give us his reasons. Also, why think that someone is interested in forcing explanations from anyone?
I think what we want to know are the psychological aspects that may lead to a change of handle, especially now that most people take it on a negative light.
The difference between a fool and a wise man is that a wise man is both but a fool is just a fool
|