[ChipsHazijaivapoa]

Watuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, Ebu we pray for jalego Obama..Nimenotice kitu haijanifurahisha..Hillary anachezea boy wetu game mbaya,Game chafu,Game rough na ametoka udosini ilhali Obama ametoka ghetto kama Chipo hapa.Itabidi jo wasee waPray..Prayer haicost anything, ni sare!

[okiedokes]

Now that you mentioned Obama, I noticed something in the news yesterday:

Bob Johnson(BET founder) who is black said something(if i quoted him right) about how Obama will not be where he is today if he were white. A few weeks back, Geraldine Ferraro was accused of playing the "race card" when she said Obama will not be where he is today if he were white. There was outrage over her remarks, and she later resigned from Clinton's campaign. Why is there no outrage too over Johnson's remarks?

Forgetting about the color of the person's skin, haven't they said the same thing?

So may be it's about time people re-define what exactly racism means? Or may be it's about time people move beyond the idea that a black and white person might say the same thing to the same audience, yet one race is accused of racism but not the other.
Hell, a white person can't even speak their mind openly for fear of being called a racist. Yet, some black people are prejudiced and go at it with impunity.
That's what is called a double standard, and I don't know why the media didn't get on it as much!!
What are your thoughts on it?

[Jalejo]

Originally Posted by ChipsHazijaivapoa

Watuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, Ebu we pray for jalego Obama..Nimenotice kitu haijanifurahisha..Hillary anachezea boy wetu game mbaya,Game chafu,Game rough na ametoka udosini ilhali Obama ametoka ghetto kama Chipo hapa.Itabidi jo wasee waPray..Prayer haicost anything, ni sare!

usijali chibisi, billary hawaendi mahali, if u analyse, ull see obama gaining on hillary in PA and is surely closing the gap.even if she wins PA the margin will be less than 8% n thats gud for obama coz it means his delegate count aint affected.n mark u, PA is the only remaining big prize state.remember texas? hillary purpotedly won the state but actually obama won the delegate count.once obama splits PA and wins N.Carolina, its game over for billary, thats wen we expect Dem big shots like nancy pelosi,howard dean, al gore, john kerry et all to prevail upon hillary to step aside n ensure that the Dem convention in august is simply a coronation ceremony for obama.lakini tunapray.

[ChipsHazijaivapoa]

Originally Posted by Jalejo

usijali chibisi, billary hawaendi mahali, if u analyse, ull see obama gaining on hillary in PA and is surely closing the gap.even if she wins PA the margin will be less than 8% n thats gud for obama coz it means his delegate count aint affected.n mark u, PA is the only remaining big prize state.remember texas? hillary purpotedly won the state but actually obama won the delegate count.once obama splits PA and wins N.Carolina, its game over for billary, thats wen we expect Dem big shots like nancy pelosi,howard dean, al gore, john kerry et all to prevail upon hillary to step aside n ensure that the Dem convention in august is simply a coronation ceremony for obama.lakini tunapray.

wazi jo, hapo umeongea kama wazae watatu wamevaa suti na slippers wanmekalia stool orcha!

[okiedokes]

Originally Posted by Jalejo

usijali chibisi, billary hawaendi mahali, if u analyse, ull see obama gaining on hillary in PA and is surely closing the gap.even if she wins PA the margin will be less than 8% n thats gud for obama coz it means his delegate count aint affected.n mark u, PA is the only remaining big prize state.remember texas? hillary purpotedly won the state but actually obama won the delegate count.once obama splits PA and wins N.Carolina, its game over for billary, thats wen we expect Dem big shots like nancy pelosi,howard dean, al gore, john kerry et all to prevail upon hillary to step aside n ensure that the Dem convention in august is simply a coronation ceremony for obama.lakini tunapray.

Yeah, good scenario there but if and only if Obama can try to avoid any more controversial comments from now till then. I'm not sure what happens to his campaign like a week before the big contests. First it was the Ohio/Texas one with the NAFTA thing, now it's PA with the "cling to guns, religion,...etc" thing. I understood what he meant, but some small town poeple were offended.

[Jalejo]

Originally Posted by okiedokes

Yeah, good scenario there but if and only if Obama can try to avoid any more controversial comments from now till then. I'm not sure what happens to his campaign like a week before the big contests. First it was the Ohio/Texas one with the NAFTA thing, now it's PA with the "cling to guns, religion,...etc" thing. I understood what he meant, but some small town poeple were offended.

i hear u, i hear u....lets hop he doesnt gaffe again.the nafta thing was a godsend to billary n boy? didnt they spin it n milk it dry? but its gud that the "bitter" comment is now slowly fizzling out n hopefully by wkend itll be a horse that cant be flogged anymore.i saw a report saying SOME pple were offended by the comment but a MAJORITY understood and agree with wat he meant.clearly those who were offended r billary supporters n its their democratic right to feel that way.obama is a phenomenon only a bullet can stop.the man is breakin all fundraising records in the history of the united states n yet the primary season is not yet over,he even is thinkin of bypassing public funds coz of his money minting prowess.he attracts mammoth crowds that only agwambo can match.

@chibisi - u r one heck of a funny dude.seriously!

[opiche]

Originally Posted by okiedokes

Yeah, good scenario there but if and only if Obama can try to avoid any more controversial comments from now till then. I'm not sure what happens to his campaign like a week before the big contests. First it was the Ohio/Texas one with the NAFTA thing, now it's PA with the "cling to guns, religion,...etc" thing. I understood what he meant, but some small town poeple were offended.

''but some small town poeple were offended''

Surely nobody was offended, but its Hillary campaign brain working out the speach in a way that it would be reflected as an offensive speech.Look, Maccain just joined Hillary to comment about the speech, and they are both reading from the same scripture.They have actually worked this guy out for a whole week forcing him to be in the deffencive, he is not even able the focus on the PA contest, but there is one thing Jalejo said that's already going on; Gore and Cater are the senior most Dems and they will have to prevail upon Hilary to step aside, and this would be done soon before the Super deligates make their decission.

Oppinion pool by Fox TV shows this-;

OBAMA VS Maccain 26% of Hilary supporters would vote Maccain
Hilary vs Maccain 19% of O

[opiche]

Originally Posted by opiche

''but some small town poeple were offended'' surely nobody was offended, but its hillary campaign brain working out the speach in a way that it would be reflected as an offensive speech.look, maccain just joined hillary to comment about the speech, and they are both reading from the same scripture.they have actually worked this guy out for a whole week forcing him to be in the deffencive, he is not even able the focus on the pa contest, but there is one thing jalejo said that's already going on; gore and cater are the senior most dems and they will have to prevail upon hilary to step aside, and this would be done soon before the super deligates make their decission. Oppinion pool by fox tv shows this-; obama vs maccain 26% of hilary supporters would vote maccain hilary vs maccain 19% of o

ref: attached under, all in all we must pray for this guy. Jalejo contact nyawawa right away!! and make sure umeleta report. Print e-mail march 26, 2008 if mccain vs. Obama, 28% of clinton backers go for mccainif mccain vs. Clinton, 19% of obama backers go for mccainusa democrats election 2008 government and politics americas northern america by frank newport princeton, nj -- a sizable proportion of democrats would vote for john mccain next november if he is matched against the candidate they do not support for the democratic nomination. This is particularly true for hillary clinton supporters, more than a quarter of whom currently say they would vote for mccain if barack obama is the democratic nominee. These conclusions are based on an analysis of democratic voters' responses to separate voting questions in march 7-22 gallup poll daily election tracking. In each day's survey, respondents are asked for their general election preferences in mccain-clinton and mccain-obama pairings. Democratic voters are then asked whom they support for their party's nomination. The accompanying graph displays the results of the relationship between support for the democratic party's nomination and the general election vote between obama and mccain. As would be expected, almost all democratic voters who say they support obama for their party's nomination also say they would vote for him in a general election matchup against mccain. But only 59% of democratic voters who support clinton say they would vote for obama against mccain, while 28% say they would vote for the republican mccain. This suggests that some clinton supporters are so strongly opposed to obama (or so loyal to clinton) that they would go so far as to vote for the "other" party's candidate next november if obama is the democratic nominee. The results follow the same pattern, but not to quite the same extent, when the relationship between democratic support and a general election matchup between clinton and mccain is examined. Here again, as expected, almost all of those who support clinton for the democratic party's nomination say they would vote for her against mccain. Seventy-two percent of those who support obama for the party's nomination would vote for clinton against mccain, while 19% would desert and vote for the republican. Implications the data suggest that the continuing and sometimes fractious democratic nomination fight could have a negative impact for the democratic party in next november's election. A not insignificant percentage of both obama and clinton supporters currently say they would vote for mccain if he ends up running against the candidate they do not support. Clinton supporters appear to be somewhat more reactive than obama supporters. Twenty-eight percent of the former indicate that if clinton is not the nominee -- and obama is -- they would support mccain. That compares to 19% of obama supporters who would support mccain if obama is not the nominee -- and clinton is. It is unknown how many democrats would actually carry through and vote for a republican next fall if their preferred candidate does not become the democratic nominee. The democratic campaign is in the heat of battle at the moment, but by november, there will have been several months of attempts to build party unity around the eventual nominee -- and a focus on reasons why the republican nominee needs to be defeated. Additionally, some threat of deserting the party always takes place as party nomination battles are waged, and this threat can dissipate. For example, in answer to a recent gallup question, 11% of republicans said they would vote for the democratic candidate or a third-party candidate next fall if mccain does not choose a vice president who is considerably more conservative than he is. (and another 9% said they just wouldn't vote.) these results suggest that it may be normal for some voters to claim early on in the process -- perhaps out of frustration -- that they will desert their party if certain things do not happen to their liking. And it may be equally likely that they fall back into line by the time of the general election. It is worth noting that in gallup's historical final pre-election polls from 1992 to 2004, 10% or less of republicans and democrats typically vote for the other party's presidential candidate. Still, when almost 3 out of 10 clinton supporters say they would vote for mccain over obama, it suggests that divisions are running deep within the democratic party. If the fight for the party's nomination were to continue until the denver convention in late august, the democratic party could suffer some damage as it tries to regroup for the november general election. Survey methods results are based on telephone interviews with 6,657 national democratic voters, aged 18 and older, conducted march 7-22, 2008. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±2 percentage points. Interviews are conducted with respondents on land-line telephones (for respondents with a land-line telephone) and cellular phones (for respondents who are cell-phone only). In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls. if mccain vs. Obama, 28% of clinton backers go for mccain

[Jalejo]

Originally Posted by opiche

ref: attached under, all in all we must pray for this guy. Jalejo contact nyawawa right away!! and make sure umeleta report. Print e-mail march 26, 2008 if mccain vs. Obama, 28% of clinton backers go for mccainif mccain vs. Clinton, 19% of obama backers go for mccainusa democrats election 2008 government and politics americas northern america by frank newport princeton, nj -- a sizable proportion of democrats would vote for john mccain next november if he is matched against the candidate they do not support for the democratic nomination. This is particularly true for hillary clinton supporters, more than a quarter of whom currently say they would vote for mccain if barack obama is the democratic nominee. These conclusions are based on an analysis of democratic voters' responses to separate voting questions in march 7-22 gallup poll daily election tracking. In each day's survey, respondents are asked for their general election preferences in mccain-clinton and mccain-obama pairings. Democratic voters are then asked whom they support for their party's nomination. The accompanying graph displays the results of the relationship between support for the democratic party's nomination and the general election vote between obama and mccain. As would be expected, almost all democratic voters who say they support obama for their party's nomination also say they would vote for him in a general election matchup against mccain. But only 59% of democratic voters who support clinton say they would vote for obama against mccain, while 28% say they would vote for the republican mccain. This suggests that some clinton supporters are so strongly opposed to obama (or so loyal to clinton) that they would go so far as to vote for the "other" party's candidate next november if obama is the democratic nominee. The results follow the same pattern, but not to quite the same extent, when the relationship between democratic support and a general election matchup between clinton and mccain is examined. Here again, as expected, almost all of those who support clinton for the democratic party's nomination say they would vote for her against mccain. Seventy-two percent of those who support obama for the party's nomination would vote for clinton against mccain, while 19% would desert and vote for the republican. Implications the data suggest that the continuing and sometimes fractious democratic nomination fight could have a negative impact for the democratic party in next november's election. A not insignificant percentage of both obama and clinton supporters currently say they would vote for mccain if he ends up running against the candidate they do not support. Clinton supporters appear to be somewhat more reactive than obama supporters. Twenty-eight percent of the former indicate that if clinton is not the nominee -- and obama is -- they would support mccain. That compares to 19% of obama supporters who would support mccain if obama is not the nominee -- and clinton is. It is unknown how many democrats would actually carry through and vote for a republican next fall if their preferred candidate does not become the democratic nominee. The democratic campaign is in the heat of battle at the moment, but by november, there will have been several months of attempts to build party unity around the eventual nominee -- and a focus on reasons why the republican nominee needs to be defeated. Additionally, some threat of deserting the party always takes place as party nomination battles are waged, and this threat can dissipate. For example, in answer to a recent gallup question, 11% of republicans said they would vote for the democratic candidate or a third-party candidate next fall if mccain does not choose a vice president who is considerably more conservative than he is. (and another 9% said they just wouldn't vote.) these results suggest that it may be normal for some voters to claim early on in the process -- perhaps out of frustration -- that they will desert their party if certain things do not happen to their liking. And it may be equally likely that they fall back into line by the time of the general election. It is worth noting that in gallup's historical final pre-election polls from 1992 to 2004, 10% or less of republicans and democrats typically vote for the other party's presidential candidate. Still, when almost 3 out of 10 clinton supporters say they would vote for mccain over obama, it suggests that divisions are running deep within the democratic party. If the fight for the party's nomination were to continue until the denver convention in late august, the democratic party could suffer some damage as it tries to regroup for the november general election. Survey methods results are based on telephone interviews with 6,657 national democratic voters, aged 18 and older, conducted march 7-22, 2008. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±2 percentage points. Interviews are conducted with respondents on land-line telephones (for respondents with a land-line telephone) and cellular phones (for respondents who are cell-phone only). In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls. if mccain vs. Obama, 28% of clinton backers go for mccain

Dont worry my boy, im planning an escursion to the high priestess of nyawawa, ill be there with all my prayers. i will report back to y'all and im sure things will be ok for wuod alego, nyawawa neva fails.

[Sugaspice]

Jaleojo/ Opiche Amoso u Jokamaa! wuod alego walemone nyasaye ko yie to ngano donjo gi thuon! *goes down on knees*