Mashada - African Chat, Discussions, Blogs, Photos, Classifieds & More!
 
HOME Forums Chat Photos Blog Events Calendar Directory

Go Back   Mashada Forums > Music & Entertainment > Books > Men who ruled Kenya : the Kenya administ...
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
(#1 (permalink))
Old
Z Z is offline
Senior Member
Z
 
Posts: 381
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: .
Report Post
Default Men who ruled Kenya : the Kenya administ... - 10-29-2004, 08:56 PM

Men who ruled Kenya : the Kenya administration, 1892-196
By: Charles Chenevix Trench
Type: English : Book : Non-fiction
Publisher: London : Radcliffe Press, 1993.
ISBN: 1850435715

Introduction

From the book, Kenya is pretty much the creation of the brits, and what we are basically dealing with in Kenya today is a continuation( classism replacing racisim today) of that legacy as far as administration is concerned. The administration of Kenya has not significantly changed since the days of colonialism,the Fundamental systems are still in place and dare I say it, it is one of the the few reasons that Kenya is supposedly more developed,simply because it is connected to what are considered and were considered the centers
of power in Europe.
Here is an interesting fact. Most of the administrators who governed Kenya were supposedly the best 'the empire' had to offer. Apparently in all of Colonial Britian,Most of the officers( DO DCs, Governors,etc),Kenya produced the largest percentage of administrators who rose to the very top in colonial administration office in the U.K.Most of them were supposedly the smartests of Oxford trained administrators.Another thing on Administration was that the Chief systems was a creation of Colonial Government(which was sometimes used to take power from the more resistive traditional leaders, Interestingly some chiefs were actually african women).

The Jungus can pretty much be divided into 3; the administrators( who saw themselves as doing the job of protecting the interests of the King), the Settlers( who wanted Kenya to be a white mans country), and the missionaries who came to 'save' the African by showing him the ways of the christianity.

Another thing, is that Kenya was pretty much built by black Africans paying taxes. It had one of the most extensive and efficient tax systems of the british colonies, especially in Central province( that is one of the reason they where some of the first people who to push for change).Black Africans were active players in alot of things.Both on the resistive and co-operative components of colonial Kenya

Stereotypes

I will start with the way they viewed some of the communites. The Luos and Lunjes were know as the Kavirondo and in the jungu adminstrators on words, where' strong in the arm and thick in the head', perfect administratees.
The Kikuyu was seen as cunning and good traders. Same could be said of the Kamba. The Massai were seen as noble and potentially dangerous. The Kipsigis was the ' Gentleman thief( cattle rustler)' . To stop them from raiding for cattle, the DC over there introduced running to them and, so it goes, the next generation became olympic champions.
The somali was proud , hot tempered and did not see himself as an African and infact demanded to be taxed at a higher rate( apparently that was just a ploy to stop paying taxes since you paid taxes by you racial classification, no classification means you don't pay taxes). They also interacted alot with the meru and the Pokomo. The Swahili were 'civilised savages or something were referred to as 'Arabs'.The Somali was not to be wiped or humilited, beacause it usually ended up with him getting his clansmen and pretty much wiping out the DCs Boma and everyone in it.Afew DCs met their fate this way after ignoring that rule of thumb

Quiet a few jungu DC(by the way,some were black African DCs in the colonial government, some who are still alive and all refused to be intreviewed for the book) took the identity of the tribes in there districts and actually would go as far as fighting with other DCs because they let their tribe graze in their district without permission or something like that. The onces who go it bad, were said to suffer from Massai-ites or Somali-ites( depending on which tribe they started identify with and acting like). Such guys were usually transferred.Some even had harems of say Kalenjin/Masaai women or of women in the district they were in.
Surprisingly, Black Kenyans who had restrictions were not necessarily poor, they had a lot of real money( indian rupees before the introduction of the shilling). Once, men were coming with whole family( several wives) each carrying sacks of money to convert it when the shilling was introduced, and these were 1920s Kalenjins!,Maasais, Turkanas,etc. In Meru alone, there were 6000 tea/coffee farmers in the late 40s pulling a some good money every year.By the late 50s, there was an Embu co-operative that made a quarter of a million british pounds in one year for its farmers. There were some black Kenyans who were doing really well.Not as well as the settlers, but they were doing well.Of course they were in the minority.

Kikuyus pretty much learnt things quickly and even established independent private schools in the 1920s.Most were connected to akina Harry Thuku and Kenyatta and run by educated africans who taught for a while in white mission schools but felt that african culture was ignored and things like circumcision which, the mission spoke against,were necessary for the black African. The Maasai(settled) used to employ many Kikuyus to tend their farms. Kenyans of all tribes used to work as far as western, making money just like today. After the Mau Mau revolt started, many Kikuyus were forced by the government to move back to central, so that the government could keep an eye on them.

Nairobi

Nairobi has not really changed much. The Eastern part was negelected( just as it is now) because that is where all the blacks lived.Apparenlty that side was just like american ghettos, from the book' it was controlled by Kikuyu armed gangs thriving on crime, prostituiton and protection rackets' This is 1950s Nairobi by the way.
Anyway as Nairobi grew, there was a increasing educated middle class. Some Africans were pretty well off(Harry Thuku owned huge tracts of Land since the 1920s after he was realised from detention).In fact some jungus wanted to engage the less radical african urabinites instead of dealing with Jomo Kenyatta, but they did not follow through, just like they ignored warnings on the coming of the Mau Mau until it was too late.

On Dedan kimathi, from the book "In March 1952 Mau Mau oathing started..... Jomo Kenyatta held a KAU mass meeting in June, and appointed a Shell Company clerk, Dedan Kimathi, as secretary of the local branch KAU.Soon after this he left his job in Shell and became the local oath adminstrator'.Far from being a 'peasant' revolt, a large part of the mau mau cadre were actually educated people or world war two veterans.

Independence

On the way to independence, at around 1960, on the request of Jomo,a large number of Africans were trained in 1 year to take over 10% of the civil service( this seems insignificant but I think it is one of the reasons Kenya did not collapse immediately after independence,considering how the Portugese and Belgians left their colonies after trashing offices and pretty much leaving things as non functional as possible). The jungu training them, even had them taught to play golf! infact it was the main reason that it is still is the main pass time for most old school senior government officials( Kibaki and crew).
Paradoxically, even the most racist settlers played a part in the new governement.The House speaker who stayed on after Kenya got independence was one of the most vocal anti independence advocate not to mention some who became cabinet ministers.

Anecdotes

A British DC in Samburu in the 1940s was trying to encourage them to change their ways so he brought out a small battle tank and had it driving around, showing some more morans what it could do.The message was modernise in the jungu way and you will have this impressive stuff.One of the morans went to inspect the tanks tracks( wheels) and went like 'Much too loose.You 'd never gotten away with that in the fourteenth Army.' The Moran was a sergant on leave.He was one of the hunderds of WW2 african/samburu soldiers.

Then there was this DC in Turkana who was infuriated with the cattle rustling and went to tell off the Turkanas in a Baraza saying that 'everyone should stick to their country' One of the Turkanas stood up and offerred that maybe the jungu would like to set an example by going back to his.

On those 1920 Kalenjins. When the money was being changed, the Jungu DC set to advertise the change and alot of Africans came to change their money from rupees to shillings.The thing was so succesful that the DC was so pleased with himself.Until his translator told him that the only reason people came in droves was that they thought that the white men were taking their money back as they(the brits) were preparing to leave for good and the faster they changed their money, the sooner the jungu would be gone.

Then during the Mau Mau. Many prisoners were moved to work in the plantations at the coast at Hola. (this is verbatim from the book).Sometimes a dhow-captain , rolling into the harbour would ask for a private talk with the DC on a confidential manner.There was, he would explain , a grave shortage of slaves in Arabia.He understood that the British government kept several hundred Kikuyu slaves at a place called Hola.Would it be possible.....?



http://www.worldcatlibraries.org/wcp...4da09e526.html
http://www.goanvoice.org.uk/suppleme...vynMaciel.html
 


Ukiishi Kwa Upanga, Utakufa Kwa Upanga
Reply With Quote
(#2 (permalink))
Old
Senior Member
mimie
 
Posts: 618
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London.
Report Post
Default RE: Men who ruled Kenya : the Kenya administ... - 11-03-2004, 06:28 AM

quite a good review of the book, makes one want to read it.

I agree with the fact that Kenya has retained the colonial set-up, whether we are speaking of administartive policies or even the class systems. which is where I see the black Kenyans replacing the class systems of the settlers so that the very rich in Kenya can now live ibn the posh areas while the kawa guys occupy eastlands. One only has to look at S.A to know how Kenya works. These guys took over from the Jungus here, but still retain everything the jungus used to run the country, bno wonder they consider themselves a 2nd world country.

I also agree that the Kikuyus 'were the most cunning? innovative?" But maybe where the book makes a mistake is the fact that the biggest issue in Kenya was Land. If so, naturally, The kikuyus had to be resistant, to get their land back, what with all the rituals and traditions they associated their land with. in comparison, those who occupied the 'dry, unreproductive' areas like the Luos and Lunjes (thick in the head? debatable) had no fine land to offer, and therefore were only useful to the jungus as extra hands(no wonder the stereotype). you notice the others (eg) Merus, kales etc had either coffee or livestock, both of which were important to the settlers, see coz they were looking for profit making ventures.

ever heard of the saying 'necessity is the mother of invention?'. Kiuks used everything in the book to get their land back and if they often arise in History as Heroes, it is because they had no choice but to fight the whites...

anyway, this particlular book echoes many that try and give us a glimpse of Kenya from a settler's (jungus generally) point of view.probably a nice read as well.

Reminds me of this settler book I read the other day, written by this bitter jungu who felt they were not given their due after independence. Mazee he destroys Jomo's image vibaya...but then as I said, all these books are normally skewed, subjective and very racist!

 
Reply With Quote
(#3 (permalink))
Old
Z Z is offline
Senior Member
Z
 
Posts: 381
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: .
Report Post
Default RE: Men who ruled Kenya : the Kenya admi... - 11-23-2004, 06:42 AM

Mimie

You are right the book is subjective because he related subjective views from Kaburus who wrote things at the time, but the author does make a serious attempt and objectivity overall.

I enjoy reading historical books on Africa and Kenya written from the Kaburus point of view. It reveals alot about them and their attitudes and prejudices at the time. I especially like it when they write books when they are pissed off because nothing reveals a person more than when they are angry.I am always amused by how they sub-consiously attempt to make it sound like colonialism was not that bad. Of course put up aganist the thugs that call themselves leaders in most African countries(Kenya included) they may have a point, but most of those thugs just adopted the colonial mentality.In essence the system did not change, only the people in charge. Like you said.

Next book to be reviewed will be Dark Star Safari, by Paul Theorux. Its a trip he made overland from Cairo to Capetown in 2001 or theres about. He makes interesting observations of the countries he goes through, including Kenya.All not good but I think he has the most balanced view of any Kaburu book I have read although he is sometimes too quick to use anecdotal evidence to support his views.

btw are you in SA? read any interesting books on SA?
 


Ukiishi Kwa Upanga, Utakufa Kwa Upanga
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0