[QUOTE=Fraglante;843711]I beg to differ. Any
socially well adjusted person, male or female will have some level of emotional attachment with the person they have sex with. I know to men, sex is more automated than it is emotional.
But ask yourself this: why is it that
some men vow to become players after heart break? Is it not to protect themselves from the emotional hurt they experienced from the heart break? Which means there were feelings involved.
Why is it that some men get so enraged (even to a point of physical violence) when they learn hat their spouse has cheated on them? Is it not because they feel emotionally violated? Meaning, there was an emotional bond developed by the physical intimacy.
If it was purely mechanical, it would be no big deal.
This is not entirely true. Consider this:
A man picks up a prostitute from Kstreet, sh.ags her and goes home to fondle the wife!!!!
A man sh.ag.s the sister to the wife, the mboch, the company secretary...etc, even when the man has no idea what her second name is
.
To men, its about the warmth, tightness and wetness (all three combined) then as an added advantage, the face value, the size of the behind (
it should be as generous as a baobab tree, to make his ego more satisfied), nowadays, men sh.ag those independent type hopeless women sticks with ash on their eyelids and red mascara on their lips just to prove that the p.uss.y is as normal as that one of the mboch, unfotunately, men realise that the mboch has a far sweeter pu.ss.y.
In addition, men screw these women in sympathy, as in she is sooo independent but the overreliance on her dildos ain't makes her happy. So a man, being teh gift to society, agrees to support such a woman, cause all that p.u.ss.y is going to waste!!!!
What was teh question again......Sorry, you asked frag and sanaa-
Ciao....