Quote:
Originally Posted by Ndigila2
I've finally given in 
I'm more interested in how well you defend the position you take
|
I read ur post before MASHADA was MIA, and returned to find Atabong had posted my mind.
The same thoughts I had, but perhaps your elucidation will help:
According to you, how d'u understand Atabong's position to be?
Once that is addressed, then it will be easier to respond
(although I'd love for u to step our of the xtian coccoon and address the other biases. The minute u start on 14th century, I get lost. Can we address the issue of misguided masses)
I closely read urs, RD's and Atabong's posts on xtianity. And I see 3 people with very different views.
U my brother have embraced xtianity (commendable), and do defend the cult. The other two are uneasy with it: one from both it's historical and after effects, the other from its after results.
My understanding of ur point is that Atabong disagrees with ur historical explanations of christianity.
The way I get his posts, history is not necessarily the issue.
RD would be the one to disagree with ur sentiments, in addition to his disagreement to the effects.
Atabong seems to be more against the effect of religion-all infact.
Again, I may be misunderstanding what u mean! I stand correction.
**As for me, I really do no care. God may be real or not, Jesus may have come or not: But whatever it is that we are being taught has nothing to do with it. And it harms people, that is my issue.