05-09-2008, 09:43 PM
Dark energy is something they cant prove. If they prove its existence, then all the classical and quantum sciences as so far known will have to be reconstructed.
What do you mean by this? If anything, once they prove it's existence, they will explain science better.
Just shows how basing reasoning on the so called scientific facts is foolish.
So what should reasoning be based on? A verse in a book written 3000 years ago by some men with an agenda about a god that may not even exist?
|