View Single Post
(#8 (permalink))
Old
ATLian ATLian is offline
Senior Member
ATLian is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Posts: 1,519
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA.
Report Post
Default 05-09-2008, 09:37 PM

BTW I'm always amused by the religious types who trash science. Yaani imagine a Christian who just came from his multi-storey office building, took a lift down, drove his car down a freeway blasting music on his IPOD, entered his nice air-conditioned house, put on the elec, removed food from the fridge and put it into the microwave, turned on his comp, logged onto the internet, and then wrote on Mashada that "science is crap". WTF? Just look at all the things you have through science that I named in the previous sentence, and see how ludicrous it is for that Christian to trash science.

Grip, I don't want to come across as condescending or patronizing, but you are clearly a sharp guy, based on what you write on Mashada. That's why it's sad to see you trash science only because it doesn't agree with your religion and god. I can understand if some other religious nutcase did that, but it's surprising coming from you.



Scientists claim absence of God, they cant prove.

Like Type-R says, science has never claimed that. Science just demands to see rational, empirical and logical evidence for any claim. Since there is absolutely no rational, empirical and logical evidence to prove the existence of any god, then of course science rejects it. But that doesn't mean that science says there is no god - it's just says that if there is a god, then the current evidence isn't sufficient enough to prove it.



They claim presence of dark energy, black holes, wormholes, white hole, dark matter, etc...but again, they cant prove.

It's interesting how there are millions of things that science has proven, yet you chose to trash science based on a cherry picked list of unproven things. Isn't that like trashing Jesus as a useless guy because of the time he lost his temper at the temple, while ignoring all the other good things he did?

Also, don't forget that there are many scientific theories that took man a while to prove. A lot of what Isaac Newton theorized about them days was only irrefutably proven last century. Does that mean that Newton's science was wrong for those years?
 
Reply With Quote