View Single Post
(#4 (permalink))
Old
truuth truuth is offline
Junior Member
truuth is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 20
Join Date: Mar 2008
Report Post
Default Why would he assume that? - 04-30-2008, 04:18 AM

"So given that C cannot have any other way of knowing that actually B fired first, isn't he wrong in his sense of knowledge that event A happened before event B? Accordingly, he is receiving future events before past events, which would mean that sense of future, present and, past are limited to our five senses of perception"
I don't understand why you are assuming that C concluding that event A happened before event B is wrong.The assumptions are more theoretical than there are practical.C can only see what is happening in his own scope of time and space.whatever occurs to C is true to C.But C is not correct based on A or B as the point of reference.
 

Last edited by truuth : 04-30-2008 at 04:33 AM.
Reply With Quote