[willpress]

Well there goes another case proving how ****ty our system can be when it comes to dealing with crimes. . .true some harsh sentences are meted out as deterrents to prevent what may be termed as common/outrageous crimes of little economic value.Remember that tout who was given 25yrs for kissn a gal without her consent.Yea something like dat.

But now as regards the heavy economic crimes(grand theft, anglo leasing, goldenberg), a double standard starts rearing its ugly head.These proceedings take unnecesarily long and jumbles up evidence into a sorry mess and a strong case is reduced to a back and forth of jargon by counsel. . . .The accused are detained for a short spell and then released.One skul of thought is that detaining these large amounts of stolen money slows down general economic progress.A grand theif probably will invest the stolen billions in say a 5star hotel like Intercontinental and bring hundreds of potential common theives into employment. . .Some sort of public policy, huh?Sounds like bullsh*t but av heard this kind of thinking more than once among VERY authoritative figures in the legal process. . .
At the end of the day, society treats the Margaryans and Pattnis of this world as celebrities.Do a survey.A huge number of kids want to be just like them.
The way the system has handled this, am seeing the volume of economic crimes to the tune of billions being the order of the day in the next few years.