11-22-2007, 07:53 PM
Muhammed was the most perfect human being ever.
Muhammed ****ed a nine year old (Aisha).
****ing nine year old girls is therefore fine.
The logic is impeccable... Yet, are you not repulsed? It isn't the lack of logic that is repellent it's the dismal, appalling premises that are repellent. And the whole sordid tale is indeed in the hadith including the gob-smacking detail that at the time of consumation the kid was told to quit playing because The Messenger was "ready for her". And this from people that think having friends of the other sex is immoral! I have seen muslim men refuse to shake hands with my wife on a deal (embarassing because she offered) yet they think screwing a nine year old girl is just dandy.
There is of course debate as to the historical accuracy of this particular skellington in big Mo's closet but that's irrelevant to me. What is relevant is what they actually put into practice. Guess what the female age of consent is in the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2007? Hint: you'll only need a single decimal numeral.
Muhammed was 53 at the time. The twisted ****. I'll respect their "deeply held beliefs" about the same time I register the domain name: "josephstalinwasaniceman.com".
Why is it that the muslims almost uniquely demand force to protect the sanctity of their prophet? Is it perhaps because there is truth in the allegations that, unlike, say, Christ***, he was an oath-breaker, murderer, warlord, peadophile, pervert and generalized scumbag with a truly delinquent take on the Bible?
|