[teejay]

>First of all, I've asked you several times to refrain from
>insults, then you start of your pile of your nonesense with
>this statement:

Death tell me if you are not intelligent; only then will I gracefully & certifiably label you unintelligent. I suppose at that point I will have halted the alleged insults.

>First of all, If you're going to call someone 'dumb'

Get to the point, you and I both know that you understood the typo error that occurred and that you read and felt the irresistible urge to correct the word instead. At least you are not too dumb after all.

>Now, you tell us:
>
>>Listen to Bill Hughes,
>
>my simple response is why should I?

Mr/Mrs/Miss/Dr/prof..... Death, Need I remind you that you are the one who asked for references and that is precisely what I am giving you. It is now upon you to look for these authors and read more from them and make up your unbiased opinion if there is any. I said that I don’t have time on my hand to scroll through web as you do and therefore I am disadvantaged as far as googling is concerned. I do however appreciate your useful cyber advice. It will help me with my forthcoming research project on procurement. But I need to let you know that aimless pasting is vague. It defeats the very noble function for which refences are projected towards.

>teejay, had you actually taken a second to do any sort of
>unbiased research, you would have realized that claim is
>ridiculous. The jesuits are by no means a secret society..for
>crying out loud, google the name and first link that comes up
>is a jesuit website giving crazy information about who they
>are (including names of specific jesuits), what they do etc
>etc etc. Some secret society they are! In addition, there are
>28 Jesuit colleges in the US alone(see
>http://www.ajcunet.edu/tier.aspx?bid=54 ). It took me but 2
>minutes to disprove the claims you made concerning their
>'secret society status. How do you expect me (or anyone for
>that matter) to take you seriously if you claim to have done
>research about the Jesuits but fail to present key facts and
>references such as the ones above?????

Are you able to differentiate between disguise and secrecy? Apart from the mono link you have grinfully pasted here I could provide you with many other links about the Jesuits that seek to debunk the oath claims against them and exonerate them from diabolism of which they are perpetually avowed to.

I still maintain that you were fooled or you are a Jesuit in defense of your course. After all we have of late seen some very amazing cover up of the Jesuit trucks. They are working hard on ensuring that the world sees them as the meek sheep. Isn’t it bearing fruits? With the likes of you defending them. It sure does. Soon more people will soon join the Rome-has-changed bandwagon (people who are not wise enough to discern that she has not relinquished her false doctrines which are the root cause of her imposition of absolutism and despotism over the world will be fooled by her new sheep like garment). They will only be shocked when her wretchedness has caused her sheep cover to rot exposing her lion traits underneath. It is in fact these days considered hate speech to identify papacy as the Antichrist. Am saying that with full knowledge that your next response will be " believe what you want."

>You go on to quote the 'Jesuit Oath'. What you posted is just
>one of two supposed versions that i've come accross in the
>little research I've done. No suprise though, that neither
>ones authenticity can even be remotley verified, and the
>Jesuits have claimed that both are completley false.

Am just proving right what I had earlier said. That you are dumb. Call that an insult. It is amazing how you can endlessly bash me for making wild proofless claims and when I certainly furnish you with a few, you turn around and do just what you accuse me of perpetrating. Nyani kusema kweli haoni ngokoye. Hivyo ndivyo wasemavyo waswahili.

Bring forth thy findings, Death. If you don’t it is easy for me to assume that they perished with thee in thy mortal state, and perhaps they are null, the reason they can’t be pasted here.

>This is basically that sums up your entire presentation. Wild
>claims backed with hear say being the only supporting evidence
>provided. With the occasional insult provided to fill in the
>vacuum created by the lack of concrete facts.

Have you ever taken a look at my auto? If not see below

>I suggest you rid yourself of your own prejudices, read the
>link on how to go about writting a research paper

Excuse me teacher! You are confusing me. First you tell me to furnish you with proof then….

BY the way the two Jesuit oaths you are talking about don’t exist only one is real, but someone whose mission is to get the heat off him decided that he will divide the Extreme oath into two portions and twist people’s minds. Death you got twisted badly. Damn! Its funny how you don’t want to believe me and keeping tripping and drifting towards the waves of darkness. You’d better believe lies than truth. God save you.