[ATLian]

>@ATLian/Death
>
>1. Comment was with reference to "100 articles"

TM, if you do actually read what we post, then I may be forced to take the other view - that you are slow! You leave me no choice, since I don't see how a person who isn't slow can keep questioning the same thing over and over despite being explained to a gabzillion times. Blind fanatical faith isn't a good thing, it makes you look the obvious in the eye and still have the balls to call it bullsh*t!



>2. Unlike Atheist in mashada ....... elsewhere atheists dont
>run behind 'I dont have to prove my side' or 'I dont have
>explain my side' agruements..... they hold discussions by
>giving alternative explaination.

Do you mind copying and pasting any of those "other" atheists alternative explanations. I'd be interested to see what they are.
From basic common sense, you don't have to give an alternative explanation to what you don't believe in. So I'd love to read what those atheists have to say.



>The basic principles of debate/discussion (ever since std4
>.... 'Better to be a Doctor or a Teacher) ..... you have to
>give BOTH the pros and cons. Even if I show that a teacher has
>a difficult job......it does NOT prove that prove that its
>better to be a Doctor.

I'll give it one more try - How do you give pros and cons of something you don't believe exists? I can argue about doctors and teachers, ama lawyers and cops, coz they exist. If you believe that it still makes sense to a rational man to discuss the pros and cons of stuff he doesn't believe exists, then please give me the pros and cons of being a mermaid over being a unicorn.