[Msoto]

>>>....so in order to be true followers of Christ (to follow
>>his
>>>teachings), they would have to renounce their orientation.
>>>
>>>I have a feeling this is hardly practical, unless being gay
>>>was a choice.
>>
>>Well who says that its not a choice, that we make?
>>
>>Being gay is as much about choice if not more than it is
>about
>>being genetic. There is no "gay gene" that has been
>>scientifically proven and validated by different articles to
>>exist. There are some correlations which arent even strong
>>enough to make any conclusion.
>>However there is alot of evidence on environmental factors
>>leading to one's apparent condition...therefore until I see
>a
>>blue print of a "gay gene" its a matter of choice as I see
>>it.
>
>I agree there's no scientific proof for "gay gene". I do
>believe homosexuality is a sin, a long with lying, decieving
>and sex before marriage etc. There's no measure in sin, we're
>all sinners, none of us are perfect. Sinning in their
>sexuality preference is their choice, their private affair. So
>what? Get over it. You have cannibals, child molesters,
>rapers, murderers etc. Now those are sins worth condemning
>because it puts people at risk.

Look i'm not against people being gay...i'm against them being gay and being christian/muslim. My reasons are clearly stipulated above.