[veritas]

>>....so in order to be true followers of Christ (to follow
>his
>>teachings), they would have to renounce their orientation.
>>
>>I have a feeling this is hardly practical, unless being gay
>>was a choice.
>
>Well who says that its not a choice, that we make?
>
>Being gay is as much about choice if not more than it is about
>being genetic. There is no "gay gene" that has been
>scientifically proven and validated by different articles to
>exist. There are some correlations which arent even strong
>enough to make any conclusion.
>However there is alot of evidence on environmental factors
>leading to one's apparent condition...therefore until I see a
>blue print of a "gay gene" its a matter of choice as I see
>it.

I agree there's no scientific proof for "gay gene". I do believe homosexuality is a sin, a long with lying, decieving and sex before marriage etc. There's no measure in sin, we're all sinners, none of us are perfect. Sinning in their sexuality preference is their choice, their private affair. So what? Get over it. You have cannibals, child molesters, rapers, murderers etc. Now those are sins worth condemning because it puts people at risk.