[safina]

Thanx for your response,at leasst you gave me your views.


>1.) If the farmed becoming stronger or more intelligent than
>you, would it not be fair for you to submit to them and be
>farmed?

If they can do it that's better for them,but trut me they will have to cross 10 rivers before they do that.

>2.) If your basis for farming is for food, are you then
>implying implicitly that you have run out of other food
>sources?

Come on now,When you put fish on your menu to replace chicken,were you running out of food?

>3.) If your argument would be for labour, then basiclly it
>would be retrogressive development, we move from buffalo to
>tractor, but you suggest we go back to buffalo?

My arguement had nothing to do with that labour thing,but even if it's labour,who cares if it's buffalo or tractor so long as the job get done.

>4.) Humans have empathy, something that you will have to
>wrestlle with when it comes to farming brain dead people.

I wonder what happens to the emphathy when we slaughter chickens.You can't know how other humans feel unless you are them,in this case you might have emphathy but I might not have it.

>5.) The question on the contribution to society has been
>tackled elsewhere on the topic of Good vs. evil where it is
>apparent that the one wielding power tends to detrmine what is
>good or not. An example of this is an article I read about a
>belgian professor who was arguing that poor people should not
>be allowed to give birth. First of all poor is relative,
>second I come from a 'poor' upbringing according to him, yet I
>have an advanced degree in electronics and I'm economicaly
>well-off, how would he have justified to my mom to abort me
>knowing what I am today?

I think you are off my main topic here.Hit me with some more points.....