[ATLian]

Coach, are you justifying terrorism?


>3) The support for Israel in their agression againts poor
>Palestinians.

Coach, if you weren't a Muslim, would you be pro-palestinian? I'm 100% pro-Israeli in that struggle, and no, it has nothing to do with religion, since I don't believe in any of the gods both sides worship, plus I have zero time for people for fight "under" god or "for" their god.

My main reason I'm anti-Palestinians is the Palestinians (and the Islamic Arabic world) don't want to just get Palestinian land - they want total annihilation of the Jews. They don't want Israel and Israelis to exist, period. If they did manage to get enough power to oust the Jews, they wouldn't just watch them leave, they'd make sure they leave in coffins. There's no way I'd support a cause that is for the genocide of another race, especially one which is 100% driven by gods that may not even exist.

My other reason is it's NOT a land issue. Of the land that used to be Palestine, 15% is Israel. The other 85% is now Egypt, Syria and Jordan. Why is it only this 15% that means so much when there's 7 times that land out there. Of course the reason is coz the 85% is owned by Muslim countries...




>>Hey Guys!!
>>
>>Another sad day when people get killed in the name of
>>God.....yet we cannot come forth and condemn these 'isms'.
>Now
>>all the adherents of these 'isms' will deny that they preach
>>'murder' yet this is exactly what has happened.
>
>
>What hapenned in London is horrible! I live 10 mins from Kings
>Cross where most of the people lost their lives. Two very
>close members of my family were lucky to have boarded the
>Picadilly Line 10 minutes later (otherwise they'd be caught up
>in it all).
>
>First of all, it is WRONG to target non-combatants, whether
>the terror is carried out by a state or a religious group. In
>this particular case, why is London the target and not Geneva,
>Stockholm, Oslo, Brussels etc.? Why was New York and Madrid
>targetted by these lunatics? Why would anyone take their time
>and risk their lives in killing innocent people? The most
>obvious reason is that the nations that are involved in the
>"War against terror" are being targetted for their
>participation in the...
>
>1) killing of innocent people around the world (Over 25 000 in
>Iraq and over 10 000 in Afghanistan [non-combtatants that is)
>
>2) The locking up of innocent people in GITMO, Belmarsh etc.
>
>3) The support for Israel in their agression againts poor
>Palestinians.
>
>
>If we agree that a life in Iraq has equal worth to a life in
>London, then the out-pour of grief would be equal when lives
>are lost. But unfortunately, when people (unpeople) are killed
>in Iraq/Afghanistan by the "coalition" of the coerced (or in
>Africa through genocide, civil wars, hunger etc.) the media
>reports it as if it was cattle that was caught up. But when
>western lives are concerned, there is usually a "humanisation"
>of the victims.
>
>satjas,
>Multi-national companies in collaboration with western
>countries cause the death of millions of poor people around
>the world every year. The biggest enemy of the world (esp poor
>people) is one -ism, Capitalism - and the liberalisation of
>economies.
>
>It is only logical to put all the energy in adressing a malign
>tumour ("Globalisation", IMF, WB, WTO etc) than to keep
>whining about a flu (War on Terror).
>
>USA and GB killed more people in Iraq than (the USA) killed in
>Hiroshima and Nagasaki; why is it that the media and the
>people of the west are more concerned about the (less than
>5000) that have died due to 'non-state terrorosim' in the
>west? Are those lives worth more?