[satjas]

Hey Zelda

>Let's keep our eyes on the ball: A practising Muslim or Jew
>cannot willfully eat haram or non-kosher meat. A Christian CAN
>eat haram or halal/ non-kosher or kosher because within the
>Christian faith, it usually does not matter (last I checked)
>how the animal was slaughtered. So if there's going to be a
>default butcher, it makes sense that the butcher slaughter the
>animals in such a way that EVERYONE in a multi-cultural/
>multi-religious town can eat the meeat, right?

At this juncture may i add that all parties are breaking their very own law that says ' thou shalt not kill' ......please don't add -it meant people....it is clear one should not kill, animals, people, High energy forms, the like.


>What follows is not the same, but might help illlustrate my
>point better: You're throwing a bash to which vegetarians and
>non-vegetarians will be coming. You can only serve one main
>dish. Seems likely that you'd serve a vegetarian dish, right?

wow wow wow.....lemme try comparing the two.....one is about how the meat is killed whereas the other is about what to eat. Zelda, it is not the same comparison.....they have no problem eating meat, its about the way it is killed.

And it does not matter how the animal is killed, there is no 'humane' way since killing is killing whether done by a bullet, knife or a hammer. Whether facing mecca or south pole. Whilst a prayer is being said or not.....imagine yourself being killed and someone is praying whilst slitting your throat, its sickening!!! And it doesn't matter if its beef, veal or ham, it is all meat- one eats it all or one doesn't. Its the draconian religious laws that prevent people from enjoying their freedom. I know some muslims and jews like ham and have no problem whether it is halal, kosher or not, they say it has not killed them eating whatever they like and yes it hasn't. They have their freedom to ingest what they want don't they???

-the paradigm shifter.....God's friend.