Click here for all the juicy details!
In the September 10th 2008 issue of the Economist, there was an article about Geo-engineering, describing the ‘Transactional Analysis’ document from the Royal scientists…
In the paper, the idea of planting trees was was ‘alluded to but not discussed’.
A second idea for scrubbing excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, alluded to in the Transactions but not much discussed, is to plant more trees. In principle, any old trees would do—although they die and rot, more forest cover would lock up more carbon dioxide. However, genetically modified trees might grow faster. Such trees are being developed to help the lumber, pulp and biofuel industries. But fast-growing forests could also be planted in order to capture carbon dioxide quickly.
Funny, this is the idea that seems doable yet it is not given much attention. Amongst other benefits, trees would help reclaim water catchment areas that are dwindling as we speak, and while we are at, why not encourage planting indigenous trees to enhance plant diversity?
It warms my heart when right wingers like Pat Robertson can sit with Al Sharpton on a setee by the beach, and proclaim that they see eye to eye on the climate crisis. The ads just point people to visit wecansolveit.org. A website will not a crisis avert. Granted they are are trying to create a community/movement, but that wont do much in my opinion. The ads would have been more effective if they pointed out one demonstrable action that people can take (I’d suggest urging people to plant trees) AND visit wecansolveit.org. Al, I love you, but please find a more practical way, or change ad agencies.
Planting trees; though quite obvious seems to make much more sense to me than giant rotating cylinders that create the ‘magnus effect’. It makes more sense that putting sulphur in jet fuel, flying in high altitudes and polluting the atmosphere so the sulphur crystals can reflect the sun’s rays off the earth. Don’t get me wrong, I would really like to believe that I am open-minded the big ideas put forth in the transactional paper. I do agree that the climate crisis is one big ginormous problem that threatens the future stability of the world, heck my grandma told me climate change is real. What is being done NOW to adapt to climate change? What are we doing to reclaim our rapidly deforested areas? Big questions. Yet, we can start with simple, yet obvious actions like planting trees.
In the quest to make it a cool thing to do (Gardeners and tree huggers are hardly rock stars) perhaps borrowing an idea from Joi Ito, he tags photos on his flickr stream with ‘freesouls’ How about we begin a tag ‘greensouls’ where you take a picture of someone/yourself planting a tree, upload to flickr, tag it and if you can, geo-tag it as ‘greensoul’?
Oh, if you can find a trader who can help monetize the tree planting to carbon credits, I would very much like to assuage my carbon guilt. I seem to have added it to my catholic guilt so now I have much more guilt than I know what to do with. It does not help that some friends keep chiding me about my carbon footprint.
My two cents on options for civil society…
First, many organizations (some of who testified before Waki) have powerful testimonials / evidence etc. from that period…I suggest bringing these back to the forefront via media etc- personalize the stories (so that it is not become just an ODM vs PNU story)…young lives were snuffed out, parents who lost a child; victims of police violence; victims of sexual violence, IDPs who are still being neglected and so on. Most of this information is sitting in fancy reports that the average Kenyan has not seen…remind people of what happened, put a human face to what happened…it might be a controversial strategy as far as “inflaming the situation” but frankly it seems like in Kenya the only way to avoid inertia when it comes to political change is a crisis.
Second, why wait for a truth and reconciliation law to be implemented? Maybe start a parallel process led by civil society focused on communities - think a gacaca type process where the focus is on addressing the “smaller fry” as it werem but at the same time build pressure on the need for the big wigs to also also be subject to a process of some sort.
Third, what civil society can do is, if things to get to the stage of an ICC referral (and even for a local tribunal), is work to build a coherent case (think PR really) for why justice is necessary and why the process won’t be “costly” as far as reigniting tensions etc. and also help build a case that can stand up in court - if (big IF) Moreno and co. come knocking looking for answers civil society should be ready with CONCRETE stuff. Pressure must be sustained in a visible manner, maybe with a weekly action - think Mothers of Plaza de Mayo. Attempt private prosecutions, even though Wako will kill that story. Anything (but press conferences and workshops in hotels about the Waki report) to keep the pressure up. It is important to note that the ICC and all other UN-type options require one to first demonstrate the exhaustion of all domestic remedies.
Fourth, international options beyond ICC (hat tip Wangui for input!)
- Pursue procedure 1503 with the office of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, especially in the cases where violence was committed by the State apparatus e.g. police. It is a cumbersome process, but taken quite seriously by the UN. Resource-wise, I’m sure this could be pitched to law school clinics in Kenya and internationally for pro-bono assistance in putting a complaint together.
- For the gender-based violence, submit a complaint to the Commission on the Status of Women.
Any other thoughts out there?